For starters, there’s little in-game help, and what's there is worse than nothing.
What sinks it, tragically, is the lack of care and attention shown to the details and player aids. Those big problems would be enough to make Planetary Annihilation a flawed-but-fun experiment. It's a fog-of-war you can never dispel even when you have radar coverage of an entire planet, your situational awareness is severely reduced.
But then you start zooming out, and begin to realize that while you're able to see more territory, the curvature of these tiny globes means that you can still only see a fraction of the playing surface before you have to spin the camera to another position over the planet. It’s exactly the Total Annihilation formula, and it’s a great place to start. Marrying supply to demand is the key to success here, and the challenge of managing it at the same time as your battle plans is intense and rewarding, and having to protect your Commander from assassination keeps you on your toes. Everything plays out via a rate-based economy, and scales up from a single Commander unit to vast armies of several hundred units by harvesting resources and building factories.
#Planetary annihilation titan ragnarok how to
Planetary Annihilation never solves the central challenge of its main conceit: how do you make an intuitive, graceful RTS interface for a game that's not contained on one map? The result is a game that always left me feeling like I was wrestling with an overloaded shopping cart with a wobbly wheel, even after I'd learned how to play it reasonably well. Planetary Annihilation's biggest problem is one of usability - and not the manageable one that comes along with being a spiritual successor to Total Annihilation and Supreme Commander, which are both large-scale real-time strategy games with complex economies.
0 kommentar(er)
